17 July 2009

This Is Not a Book


I love creative people.
They make me think.
They get me out of the boxes I allow myself to sit in.

Check out Keri Smith's latest frolic into creativity.

She's super with journals and thinking and ideas and fun.

On her site, you can click on each of her handwritten notes seen here and they take you to another page. Nice.

Aim High




















SAME: adj.

  1. Being the very one; identical.
  2. Similar in kind, quality, quantity, or degree.
  3. Conforming in every detail.
  4. Being the one previously mentioned or indicated; aforesaid.

16 July 2009

Ever Met a Refugee? Pt 3 of 3

You fill out forms. Then more forms. You wait. You don’t know where they go, who sees them. You wait. Programs are announced. Meagre training schemes occupy some time. You have lots of time on your hands. Not much else. Waiting in line for your weekly box of food. Playing or watching the football games become your main interaction and entertainment. Tempers can flair! Too much emotion with too few outlets.

Rumours fly as to possibilities of going to the USA, Canada, Australia! How many can go? What ages or qualifications do they accept? What’s the weather like there?

We heard they sent some nomadic desert dwelling Sudanese to Norway. What do Nomads do in Norway in winter? Priorities shift. It’s no longer about you or the older generation. Where can we go where our kids will have opportunities? Pray for doors to open where they’ll get good education! What of culture, status, retaining our identity? Luxuries. Who will they marry? Will they always be marginalised, misfits, alien? They’ll be safe from the threat at home and will be out of this interminable hell of a camp!

“I’m doing the best I can,” he says.
“You’re doing nothing,” she replies.

Powerless. Respect diminishes. We’re together but only physically.

The kids’ English improves. They begin interpreting. We’re reliant on them in interviews with officials.
“What did he say?”
“You fill out the form. It’ll go faster.”
“But Dad, the man said it’d be better if we . . .”
“Don’t talk to me like that! I’m still your father!”

What does that even mean now? Everything’s up for re-negotiation, but I’m powerless to control the outcomes. How did we get here? Oh yeah, we walked.

Finally out of the camp in Africa. Finally out of the resettlement camp in South Auckland. We were thrown together with people from so many places to learn how to cross the street in New Zealand, how to use and flush the toilet, make a phone all and get money from the ATM.

Now I’m sharing a house down a right of way with my sister. Ahhhh. The curtains don’t match the sofa, but we have curtains. Keep ‘em closed. This is safe here in this house.

Now what? English! It’s the key to jobs, education . . . our future. Which programme? How to get there? Who pays? More paperwork. Which form?

Ever seen a refugee cry? It takes a lot to push them over the edge. Another round of forms and glitches and explanations will do it. Huge tears, slowly coursing down her dark face.

15 July 2009

Ever Met a Refugee Pt 2 of 3

One among you does not have ID. They are taken to a more secure area until that is resolved. How can it be resolved? There’s no going back to the school or clinic for corroborating documents. It’s out of your hands. You are powerless.

The rest of you are assigned to two tents in a long row of identical tents among identical rows of tents. It would be easy to get lost here. Hold on to the children!

At least you have two tents so you can utilize the space between for cooking or resting. You hear your children crying for home as they go to sleep. You hear crying from other tents. Sorrow gets no privacy.

Because you have two tents, you can carve out a bit of “privacy” or space without being either inside or right at the edge of the walking traffic between the rows. Exhaustion and fear make the situation appealing at first. Everyone has a cot and blanket. A box of veggies and a bag of rice comes on a big truck each week. You join the line and receive the allocation for your family. You walk “home” as the “provider”. Everyone’s relieved. So why do you feel so empty?

Months pass. Years. The old or frail die in the camp. Burial is again out of your control, none of the rites your culture assumed normal. Children are born in the camp. No naming ceremony or celebrations as you would have had back home. How can you celebrate the uncertainty you’ve brought this child in to? But then, you celebrated your older children in ignorance, never thinking this might happen.

What could you have done differently? Why didn’t you foresee . . . ? Can’t live there, in the land of “what if’s”. Must live here in this camp, everyday, surviving until an opportunity presents itself. “We are safe! Isn’t that enough?”

14 July 2009

Ever Met a Refugee? Pt 1 of 3

They come in all shapes and sizes, with colours, accents and stories. To sit and listen to the stories, each one as different as the particular individual telling it, will both sadden and inspire your heart.

Each will be a story of choices, though the person you’re listening to will not have made the major choices. Those choices were made for them.

The choice to have a war where normal people were just trying to live life.
The choice to be of the wrong tribe or ethnic group or religious persuasion/flavour.
The choices are often made by the powerful, or by those who want to be. Sometimes the only choices a refugee had was to get on a bus or not, or which border to try to reach safely with as many family members as could make it.

Whether Karen’ Burmese, Kurdu from Iran or Congolese, safety is often far from home and requires relinquishment of everything familiar and comfortable.

How would it be for you to awake suddenly in the early hours of the morning with a menacing and unavoidable risk drawing near? You are powerless to stop it – the first of many times you are acutely aware of your powerlessness. You seek options, but they become fewer and fewer and none of them are desirable. Finally, it is flee or die!

What do you take? Starting out you might have essential plus a few comforts; memorabilia or an extra tool. But when you have to choose between carrying your exhausted mother or child and clinging to your favourite guitar, you choose your loved one. Hopefully, between your few family members you can manage a pot, a knife, a bottle for water and a waterproof packet for your identifying documents!

You walk. You’d like to get transport for the weaker ones, but you also know you must stay together. Each other is all you really have left. Eventually, eating what you can scavenge along walkways and roads crowded with others on the move, you reach a facility set up by the Red Cross or the UN. You are sorted like sheep. Decisions are made on the basis of fitness or available places in the camp. You have no choice. No say. No power.

13 July 2009

Uncle Arthur Died Last Week

Uncle Arthur died last week. He wasn't my uncle, but the uncle of my friend Heather. I first met Uncle Arthur at a family funeral a few years ago, that of Heather's mum, Arthur's sister. I was in the area on business, got the message that Heather's mum had died, so changed my plans and drove north from Wellington to Palmerston North to be with her.

They just enveloped me in with the family during the events, including a small family dinner gathered round Uncle Arthur's table. I was seated next to my host, though it was his lovely wife and daughter who were really providing the meal. A look at Heather and the others told me they'd intentionally seated me there as they waited to see what would unfold.

Meat & veggies were passed around. Glasses filled and forks made the journey from plate to mouth all round the table. The snippets of the conversation that I remember best went something like this.

"You're American."
"Yes," I said.
"Humph. Don't like Americans."
"Really? Why?" I asked, seated at his table.
"You know I was in the war? Stationed overseas."
"Yes." I had seen photos of young Arthur and his friend in uniform, the one he'd helped get hitched to his sister. The result was a lifelong friendship between the two couples with many caravan trips and great memories, and, of course, my friend Heather.
"Ya know the worst thing about Americans?"
I waited looking at him expectatntly.
"While we were overseas fighting, they were called in to protect New Zealand. Churchill talked to Roosevelt and decided it made more sense than calling us home as the Americans were nearer when the threat was so great."
I waited appreciating a history lesson from a man who had lived it.
"We'd probably all be speaking Japanese today if not for your lot."
I waited.
"The worst thing though, was that all those Yanks in uniform, strutting about, had nylons and chocolate and stuff and with 'em they stole the hearts of the Kiwi girls. They took all the prettiest girls home with 'em when they went!"
If I could describe the indignation on the face of Heather's old auntie!
"And what about me, ya old . . . .?" she said.
"Oh, I had you sown up before I left," he answered confidently, maybe too confidently to this faithful woman, his wife of many many years.

The rest of the family of course was waiting with bated breath never knowing what Uncle Arthur might say next, and leaving me to be toyed with. I didn't mind being the entertainment after a stressful day of farewelling Heather's mum. Besides, Uncle Arthur was an old dear.
The rest of the family might not have thought so any longer, having heard all of his stories a few times too many and having to remind him of things he used to remember.

The old man asked me my opinion on a few things Kiwi and then we discussed America and it's role in history. The conversation ranged widely and was interesting to me.

When it was time to go the whole family was pleasantly amused when Uncle Arthur kissed me on the cheek, respectfully and affectionately. I'd won him over, regardless of the behaviour of those debonair Yanks in uniform years before I was even born!

So when Heather told me on Sunday that Uncle Arthur had died, I felt a loss. Oh, the stories that went with him; stories of war, of projects with his brother-in-law, of trips and laughter and love.

The American invasion of NZ

At any one time between June 1942 and mid-1944 there were between 15,000 and 45,000 American servicemen in camp in New Zealand. For both visitor and host it was an intriguing experience with much of the quality of a Hollywood fantasy. The American soldier found himself 'deep in the heart of the South Seas', in the words of his army-issued pocket guide. He was in a land of tree-ferns and semi-tropical 'jungle'. He usually came either before or immediately after the horror of war on a Pacific island, and he found a land of milk and honey (literally), of caring mothers and 'pretty girls'.

For the host people, just struggling out of a depression and now nearly three years into the anxieties and deprivation of war, the arrival of thousands of well-fed young Americans with smiles on their faces, charm in their hearts and money in their pockets was a Hollywood romance come briefly to life. New Zealanders too have recalled the experience in novels and a television drama.

What gave the encounter its special romance was that the two peoples were sufficiently similar to communicate, but sufficiently different to find each other intriguing. Both were a former colonial people with a frontier past. Both believed in democracy and civil liberty, and the capitalist way of life. Most people in both countries used English as their mother tongue. And from December 1941 the similarities became even stronger as the two peoples, each with a Pacific coastline, found themselves at war with Japan.

Yet in the early 1940s there were also significant differences. The United States was a large and confident society of more than 130 million people, many of whom, a generation before, had been slum-dwellers or peasants in Europe. New Zealand by contrast was a small, isolated country with 1.6 million inhabitants, about the population of Detroit, Michigan. It remained in many ways colonial in outlook, a Britain of the South which had some difficulty convincing the new arrivals that it was not ruled by Winston Churchill.

So the 'American invasion' (as New Zealanders affectionately called the event) brought a considerable clash of cultures. Though Kiwi and Yankee spoke the same language, they did so with different accents. Though they shared a fondness for owning cars, they drove on different sides of the road.

The Troops Arrive The invasion began in Auckland on 12 June 1942 when five transport ships carrying soldiers of the US army (or 'doughboys' as they were called) sailed into the harbour. Two days later marines (or 'leathernecks') landed in Wellington. They had arrived as a result of the outbreak of war in the Pacific six months before. From the New Zealand perspective the Americans strengthened New Zealand's defences against possible Japanese attack; while the Americans saw New Zealand as a valuable source of supply and a staging post for operations against the Japanese in the Pacific.

For Aucklanders, the invasion began on a wintry Friday afternoon, 12 June 1942. The skies were grey, the water the colour of steel, as five transport ships, with a cruiser in front and a destroyer in the rear, sailed into Auckland harbour unannounced. The next morning the Mayor of Auckland, J.A.C. Allum, and four military bands stood on Prince's Wharf waiting to greet the new arrivals. They played appropriate pieces -'The Stars and Stripes Forever', 'Colonel Bogey' - and were quickly answered by wide-mouthed sousaphones on board ship playing 'Roll Out the Barrel'. Local ferries blared their horns, passengers waved; the Americans, nurses in blue, soldiers in olive-green, cheered and crammed the cityside of one transport so tightly that the ship listed heavily.

As they berthed another interesting exchange occurred. The Americans threw down oranges, cigarettes and money; the waiting Kiwis picked up the gifts and threw back New Zealand coins. Some of the visitors wondered where they were, but an American on the wharf, one of the advance guard, gave them all the information they needed to know: 'No Scotch, two per cent beer, but nice folks.' Some evidently did know what country they had reached, for the first of the newcomers to land on New Zealand soil was Sergeant Nathan E. Cook, chosen in commemoration of the explorer Captain James Cook. It was some hours before all his comrades of 145 Regiment of the 37th US Army Division were marched off to the railway station and to camp.

Read more from NZ History Net.

Why did they come? It was the dramatic spread of war to the Pacific some six months earlier which had brought about the first substantial landing of foreign troops in New Zealand since British regiments had left in the 1860s.

On 7 December 1941 Japanese bombers had crippled the American Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor in Honolulu. If New Zealanders felt vaguely thankful that the Americans were now involved in the war, their confidence was quickly shaken. Within days British naval strength, for so long New Zealand's surest bastion, was shown to be vulnerable. The warships Prince of Wales and Repulse were sunk by Japanese torpedoes. By Christmas Day Hong Kong had fallen; and then on 15 February Singapore surrendered. Four days later Darwin was bombed. Some New Zealanders became alarmed that Auckland might be next.

The Prime Minister, Peter Fraser, appealed to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill for assistance in strengthening New Zealand's defence, making the point that with war in the Pacific New Zealand could become a main base area. Churchill was in no position to help, but he was sympathetic to Fraser's plea. There was the obvious option of withdrawing the New Zealand Division from the Middle East to defend the homeland as the Australians had done. But the war in the Middle East was delicately balanced, and the New Zealand troops had been trained to fight there. To withdraw them would be time-consuming and costly in terms of shipping. So on 5 March Churchill asked Roosevelt to send a division to New Zealand on the condition that the New Zealanders remained in Egypt. Roosevelt agreed, and on 24 March cabled that 'we are straining every effort' to send forces at the earliest moment.

12 July 2009

Preparing for a 3 month journey

I'm packing for three month journey. Suitcase is out. Piles near it are growing. TO DO lists are working.

Do I think of it as an absence or as a trip? I seem to be switching gears between thinking of what I'll need as I go and what I need to set in place for while I'm gone.

What about the plants? Gotta call what's-her-name! Are all library books returned? Is the car okay to sit idle?

The banking accounts? Yes, I can do things online, but it's good to have it all sorted as I'll have little routine on the road.

Do I have the computer backed up and all info at hand? Print out those flight numbers and phone numbers. Registered for the conference over there? Yep. What of the one here in November? Sorted.

What am I taking for gifts? Tea is good for some. Chocolate biscuits for others. Keychains, t-shirts, hats . . . .

Go with two bags? But I only need one. Will need another for the trip back as I'll do some shopping. Do I have to pay for bags? On the internal US flights, yes. Thus the cheaper fares. Take snacks for the flights otherwise the next story will be Hungry Over America.
Packing checklist

11 July 2009

Please don't eat the super glue!

Had some interesting conversations over dinner tonight.
I say "over dinner" as it was cooked in front of us at a Japanese restaurant not far from my house. The sizzling teppan turned the onions soft and sweet, the prawns crispy and hot, and everything else just yummy. There was even a Yum Yum sauce! Miso soup, salad, ginger & mustard sauces, ending with green tea . . . . ahhh.

Conversation? Imagine 6 women discussing flying lessons, seeking porpoises to swim with, dogs and their antics, etc. Much of it was too funny. The dog that chewed up the super glue tube is okay, just a little pucker that won't go away right away. Imagine the story though, the telling of it with hands flying and facial expressions and the whole picture of two women wrestling a boxer to get the tube before she glued her lips to her teeth to her tongue and then gummed up her innerds!

We were a varied lot; kiwis and two Americans, amongst us a jeweler, a sign writer and four of us in helping professions. There were stories, much laughter, discussions of future adventures involving snow skiing, sedate rail trail cycling trip and the Wanganui River canoe trip we hope to do when it warms up. We spoke of fishing from a kayak, flying lessons and geocaching, each adventure activity fraught with potential danger and humour!

All of this over a yummy meal after a day of celebrating a 36th birthday. No, not mine. That would been a few years ago. Okay, more than a few years ago.

It's good to celebrate friendship and birthdays. It's good to laugh together, especially when it is at no one's expense. It's good to go back to memories and to create new ones. Mixing old friends and new ones doesn't always work, but it's sure fun when it does work and everyone has a good time.

See super glue for wound repair here.

10 July 2009

Communities of Faith

"Communities of faith and churches are called to be centres of discipleship and mission. They are meant to be multi-voiced worshipping communities, places of friendship and accountability, living in God’s kingdom in active anticipation of it’s coming in full. Young and old are valued, consultative leadership is exercised, and roles are related to gifts rather than gender."

from
Prodigal Kiwi(s) Blog posted by Don Sewell

Dagwood Oreo?


For Ashleigh.

Care to caption, anyone?

09 July 2009

How to get in?

As I came through the Customs process at Auckland International Airport, the official saw that I had written CHAPLAIN in the EMPLOYMENT field on the form. Immediately, without preamble or hesitation, she said, "I need to go to church more."

After a day of airports and a long flight, I wasn't quite ready for this, but went with the conversation as she started it.

"Why would you want to do that?" I asked.
"Well, I know I should," she said.
"If it is out of your love for Jesus, then by all means. If it is out of a legalistic obligation that will make you think you are earning enough points or ticking all the right boxes, don't bother." Her surprised look made me continue. "It's about Jesus. If what you do flows from your relationship with Him, then it will be satisfying and have meaning. If it is about 'shoulds and oughts' then that is religion and quite a hard burden to carry."

"Oh! Thanks for that. I suppose you're right. Welcome home!" she said with a smile as she stamped my passport and handed it back.

I went through to collect my bags.

08 July 2009

Unfortunate Naming Of Virus


Uhm, captions, please.

Where do you get your news?

In a recent conversation with friends from several different countries, I lamented that fact that local newspapers in my home state in the US had little international news content. A follow-up comment from a friend suggested that the same was true here in Auckland. Not seeing quite the comparison, I asked her where she went for her international coverage. She, and others in the conversation, said they went to the webpages of the major broadcaster in their country of origin.

In teasing this out a bit, and in ruminations thereafter, we've decided that we are often more comfortable with news presented in tandem with our own worldview. We are interested in and process news as it pertains to us. Might be an obvious conclusion to make, but it is interesting, I think.

Expatriates often seek out familiar sources for news, subliminally choosing an ethnocentric filter through which they'll receive and process input. That is why so many international websites offer personalised search features. I can search primarily through New Zealand specific Google.co.nz or in the larger pool of Google.com. That s why the BBC offers an international version of it's site.

When I lived in Africa I was very dependent on the BBC for a version of the international news that was not filtered through the Zimbabwean censors or agenda. In the last few years, Zimbabweans have been even more desperate to hear news that was balanced and not driven by the politics of that country.

In countries where the press is either a tool of or heavily censored by the government, people have often sought news from "outside".

Where do you get most of your news? If you live close to "home" you may not need to choose your path to news. If you live in a different cultural context or in a multi-cultural city, your choices will be many and varied. How do you decide what to read or listen to in this info overload era?

Check out World Newspapers to feed your selective info cravings.

07 July 2009

Jesus Painter


Mike Lewis paints large portraits of Christ in under twenty minutes.

It began when his close friend, Christian songwriter Seth Haines, told him that he had written a song called "Intimate Portrait" and wanted Mike to paint a portrait of Christ on stage during the song. Although Mike was in art school, he had never really painted before. The request was actually rather unreasonable in terms of possibility. Seth wanted a portrait large enough for an entire audience to see and also a likeness to Christ painted in seven minutes. Artists will tell you that usually portraits are very time consuming and some spend years on a single piece. Intimidated by the request but challenged by God Mike decided to trust him and began planning for the painting. After several months of thought and preparation the night arrived. Mike did not have the available funds to do a practice painting so the first try was live on stage. After a short prayer with his friend Mark Herrera that whatever happened God would be glorified through the artwork he walked to the stage and began to paint. Mike says that immediately everything disappeared except the canvas. He has described it as his most peaceful personal time with Christ. He began to swirl colors from the entire spectrum into the face of Christ, then at the end of the painting when the face was recognizable he began to throw blood (red paint) right in Jesus' face. This can be painful to watch but we need to realize that we are responsible for the blood that he shed.